For many parents, watching their spawn
begin post-secondary education brings back memories of being all choked up over
the tike’s first day of kindergarten and elementary school. It’s a time when
parents realize how the years have flown past and with heavy hearts reminisce of
the reliance the children once had on them. They grow up so fast.
Campus life is many things. It brings
together students from the full spectrum of religious and spiritual beliefs,
socioeconomic backgrounds, and political slants. They attend their chosen
studies to achieve the education needed in their future occupations, adhering
to an impossible timetable of study, work, and play. This mixture of
personalities and purposes results in a vibrant elixir that sharpens
imaginations, stimulates the senses, and propels minds to achieve. And after a
few years of indoctrination, graduates are dressed in an unflattering gown,
capped with a funny matching hat, and urged to take on the world.
Campus life is other things too. Those
very same students with all their prides and prejudices become citizens of a
city within a city where not everyone plays by the rules. In the United States,
a recently released report by The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) claims that
one in five female students will be the victim of rape or attempted rape by the
time they graduate. The US Department of Justice says that figure is closer to
one in four.
As with sexual assaults in the general
population, pinning down an accurate figure is difficult due to the high degree
of under reporting. The CPI research goes on to say that prosecutors are
reluctant to prefer charges against alleged campus perpetrators largely because
the cases boil down to a He Said, She Said situation where various levels of
intoxication are involved by both assailant and victim.
With the victim lacking any feeling of
justice, she follows the only other path available; that of seeking sanctions
against the offender through the university’s Code of Conduct process. The
harshest penalty available for the ill-trained resolution panel under this
loose amalgamation of vague passages is the expulsion of the offending student,
but it is a rarity that this measure is undertaken. Statistics show that in
better than 85% of cases adjudicated under these processes, absolutely no
sanctions were meted out to the offender, even if he has confessed to his
complicity.
The overall stance from institutes of
higher learning appears to be that they are educators, not judiciary, and cases
brought forward under resolution panels are a thoughtful way to hold the
offender accountable and should focus on lessons to be learned by the offending
behavior, rather than punishing anyone.
Campuses in the United States, eager to
attract tuitions and grant money, are subject to the Clery Act and to what is
known as Title IX. The Clery Act and Title IX are federal laws that mandate
colleges and universities to report crimes on campus and provide key rights to
victims. It is full of loopholes that campuses exploit to paint a picture of a
safe learning environment for prospective and current students.
One of the more glaring findings
contained in the CPI’s report is that campus rapists tend to be serial
offenders who have, on average, six victims. Clearly the perpetrators are aware
that their felonious activities are given little importance by campus
administration and are likely to be covered up to avoid embarrassment to the
school. There is no research to show if campus offenders continue their plunder
in the general population once they graduate. Even if you don’t buy lottery
tickets, you would still have to bet that offenders do not cease their criminal
acts once they receive their parchment.
In Canada, there is no equivalent of the
Clery Act or of Title IX. No recent research has been conducted a la The Center
for Public Integrity. But none of this should suggest that the crisis of rape
on campus is any different in Canada than it is in the United States.
As with the United States loopholes,
crime on campus statistics in Canada is full of inconsistencies. While there is
no legislation for post-secondary institutions in Canada to publish their crime
data, most do so as part of their disclosure to parents and students. However,
some publish only the previous month’s crimes and there is no standard for equity
in reporting. Others, such as the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon
openly post all their crime statistics online, and according to Bob Ferguson,
Director of Campus Safety, were the first in Canada to do so.
Victims of sexual assault on campus face
peculiar hurdles not faced by victims in the general population. Because of the
intermingling of offender, victim, and witnesses in close confines such as
dorms, fraternities, and sororities, when a victim makes an allegation of
sexual assault, it often causes dissention among the various close-knit
demographics, splitting opinions, friendships, and interpretations of the
assault. This is further aggravated by these groups of people attending classes
together and the institution wanting to protect its reputation and exposure to
litigation. These factors contribute heavily to complaints being recanted by
the victims, or the victim dropping from or transferring out of the university.
There is considerable reluctance on the
part of educational institutions to discuss sexual assaults on campus in
Canada. Few of the universities, all household names in primary cities of
Canada, contacted for comment and input for this article responded. There could
be any number of reasons why they did not wish to contribute to this article,
but it should not go unnoticed that the faculty and staff presumably have
children who currently, or will soon, attend a post secondary facility.
Given the odds indicated by The Center
for Public Integrity or the US Department of Justice that 20-25% of young women
who attend a college or university will be the victim of a sexual assault or
attempted sexual assault during their years of study, one would have to
question why this subject is not on top of every campus agenda to protect potential
victims, advocate for victims who come forward, and contribute greatly to the
punishment of offenders.
No comments:
Post a Comment