It began with the best of intentions. Another war-torn
country facing unimaginable suffering with western countries trying to do the
right thing by stepping up to the plate and offering a new beginning for
families caught amid the constant shelling from above.
There have been times throughout recent history when
first world nations have extended the life-changing offer of refugee status on
an emergency basis to accommodate a large scale influx of foreigners in peril,
however, the mass migration of Syrians to Europe and North America is without
precedent in terms of sheer volume. So much so, that a sense of buyer’s remorse
has taken hold, forcing some well-meaning politicians to back-peddle on pledges
made to those who have less than nothing.
The overly ambitious plan to resettle millions of Syrians
in western countries that are themselves struggling to keep their economies
afloat and their citizens working was perhaps an exercise in futility. The
sacrifices being requested of first world nations were met with legitimate
questions of how so many with such little education or the ability to speak the
language could be integrated into the adoptive homes that had precious little
time to prepare. From finding warm weather clothing, to locating affordable
housing, to identifying established communities of Syrian heritage, the
timeline to execute such audacious plans was too daunting.
There were well-publicized reports of Syrian refugees
decrying their temporary conditions once entering their adoptive homes. To
some, the refugees seemed ungrateful or felt entitled. In Canada, personnel were evicted from their
homes on military bases targeted to house incoming refugees. Cities such as
Vancouver begged Trudeau’s government to slow down the gorging river of
refugees, as they realized how overwhelmed they were in attempting to secure and
commit the resources necessary to tend to a people whose previous emigrants
were few in number.
Germany accepted 1.2 million Syrian refugees, a sticking
point with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s electorate who vow to make her pay dearly the
next time votes are cast. Her spin to soften her position is to now say the
refugees are temporary, citing those from the former Yugoslavia, 70% of which
returned to their homeland. That still leaves 30% more than 20 years later.
The Danish are demanding refugees surrender valuables upon
arrival as a hedge against that country’s well developed social structure from
imploding under the weight of its new inhabitants. Prime Minister Lars Lokke
Rasmussen has even called for the abolishment of the UN refugee convention of
1951.
In the United States, where an election this year to
choose the next President has created controversial statements from
frontrunners regarding immigration in general, many are questioning the wisdom
in accepting so many refugees while `there is a war going on with them`.
Back in Canada, a country upheld as a model of the
multicultural cauldron, Syrian refugees face a steep uphill battle to master
the English language as a fundamental necessity to compete for employment in an
arena already filled to capacity amid a crumbled economy. Even with the short
term assistance provided by Justin Trudeau`s Liberals, and not without its own
vocal opposition attached, one can only wonder how sustainable it is to import
low-skilled masses before regret manifests itself into hostility.